Comments on: NAKED trademark Victoria’s Secret v. Urban Decay http://fameappeal.com/2012/08/naked-trademark-victorias-secret-v-urban-decay/ ENTERTAINMENT & FASHION INDUSTRY ON A LEGAL CATWALK Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:09:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Amanda http://fameappeal.com/2012/08/naked-trademark-victorias-secret-v-urban-decay/comment-page-1/#comment-1658 Amanda Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:10:54 +0000 http://fameappeal.com/?p=3394#comment-1658 Good job VS! Urban Decay is too aggressive and arrogant. Good job VS! Urban Decay is too aggressive and arrogant.

]]>
By: Victoria's Secret vs. Urban Decay | The Style and Beauty Doctor http://fameappeal.com/2012/08/naked-trademark-victorias-secret-v-urban-decay/comment-page-1/#comment-1646 Victoria's Secret vs. Urban Decay | The Style and Beauty Doctor Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:02:03 +0000 http://fameappeal.com/?p=3394#comment-1646 [...] Rather than deal with litigation tennis, Victoria’s Secret brand asked for a declaratory judgement on 7/31/12 to say whether or not Urban Decay Cosmetics owns sole use of the term ‘Naked’ for its cosmetics products. You can read the entire complaint as posted over on FameAppeal.com. [...] [...] Rather than deal with litigation tennis, Victoria’s Secret brand asked for a declaratory judgement on 7/31/12 to say whether or not Urban Decay Cosmetics owns sole use of the term ‘Naked’ for its cosmetics products. You can read the entire complaint as posted over on FameAppeal.com. [...]

]]>